Ivan Shishkin, Rye (1878)

Problems/Reduction of endomorphismUnreviewedEdited since review

On the localization of eigenvalues : Gershgorin and Hadamard

by pietro.pende·
40
Difficulty scaleÉchelle de difficulté

This score reflects both the level of the required concepts and the difficulty of the solution.Ce score tient compte à la fois du niveau des notions nécessaires et de la difficulté de la résolution.

  1. 110First steps / middle schoolPremiers pas / collège
  2. 1125Beginner / high schoolDébutant / lycée
  3. 2650Intermediate / undergraduateIntermédiaire / licence
  4. 5170Advanced / graduateAvancé / master
  5. 7190Expert / specializedExpert / spécialisé
  6. 91100Research levelNiveau recherche
These levels are approximate guides.Ces niveaux sont des repères approximatifs.
·
English
EnglishFrançais
Unreviewed. This problem changed after its last review and should be reviewed again.

Let U=(uij)1i,jnMn(C)U=(u_{ij})_{1\leqslant i,j\leqslant n}\in \mathcal{M}_n(\mathbb{C}). For every i1,ni\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket, let

Λi:=1jnjiuij\Lambda_i:=\sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}}|u_{ij}|

and

Di:={zC  |  zuiiΛi}.D_i:=\left\{z\in\mathbb{C}\;\middle|\;|z-u_{ii}|\leqslant \Lambda_i\right\}.

(We call DiD_{i} the ii-th Gershgorin disc)

  1. Gershgorin’s theorem : Show that every eigenvalue of UU belongs to one of the disks D1,,DnD_1,\ldots,D_n, that is,

    Sp(U)i=1nDi.\operatorname{Sp}(U)\subset\bigcup_{i=1}^nD_i.

  2. Hadamard’s theorem : Suppose that

    i1,n,uii>1jnjiuij.\forall i\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket,\qquad |u_{ii}|> \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}}|u_{ij}|.

    Show that UU is invertible.

    (It is then said that UU is strictly diagonally dominant.)

I solved itMark it doneAdd to my listKeep it in your list

Solutions

1
Reveal solutionsAre you sure? Give it a try first.

Solution by pietro.pende

Discussions1 useful vote
  1. Let λSp(U)\lambda\in\operatorname{Sp}(U). By definition of the spectrum, there exists an eigenvector

    Z=(z1zn)Cn{0}Z= \begin{pmatrix} z_1\\ \vdots\\ z_n \end{pmatrix} \in\mathbb{C}^n\setminus\{0\}

    such that

    UZ=λZ.UZ=\lambda Z.

    Since Z0Z\neq0, the set

    {zx  |  x1,n}\left\{|z_x|\;\middle|\;x\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket\right\}

    is a non-empty finite subset of R\mathbb{R}. It therefore has a maximum. Choose

    i1,ni\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket

    such that

    zi=maxx1,nzx.|z_i| = \max_{x\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket}|z_x|.

    Since Z0Z\neq0, this maximum is strictly positive, and consequently

    zi0.z_i\neq0.

    The equality UZ=λZUZ=\lambda Z gives, by considering its ii-th component,

    j=1nuijzj=λzi.\sum_{j=1}^n u_{ij}z_j=\lambda z_i.

    Isolating the term corresponding to j=ij=i, we obtain

    (λuii)zi=1jnjiuijzj.(\lambda-u_{ii})z_i = \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}}u_{ij}z_j.

    Since zi0z_i\neq0, we can divide by ziz_i, whence

    λuii=1jnjiuijzjzi.\lambda-u_{ii} = \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}} u_{ij}\frac{z_j}{z_i}.

    Taking absolute values and using the triangle inequality, we obtain

    λuii1jnjiuijzjzi.|\lambda-u_{ii}| \leq \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}} |u_{ij}| \frac{|z_j|}{|z_i|}.

    By the definition of ii,

    j1,n,zjzi,\forall j\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket,\qquad |z_j|\leqslant|z_i|,

    and hence

    j1,n,zjzi1.\forall j\in\llbracket 1,n\rrbracket,\qquad \frac{|z_j|}{|z_i|}\leqslant1.

    It follows that

    λuii1jnjiuij=Λi.|\lambda-u_{ii}| \leqslant \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}}|u_{ij}| = \Lambda_i.

    By the definition of DiD_i, we therefore have

    λDi.\lambda\in D_i.

    Thus, every eigenvalue of UU belongs to one of the disks DiD_i. Consequently,

    Sp(U)i=1nDi  .\operatorname{Sp}(U) \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^nD_i \; .

  2. Suppose that

    i1,n,uii>1jnjiuij.\forall i\in\llbracket1,n\rrbracket,\qquad |u_{ii}|> \sum_{\substack{1\leqslant j\leqslant n\\j\neq i}}|u_{ij}|.

    For every i1,ni\in\llbracket1,n\rrbracket, we then have

    uii>Λi.|u_{ii}|>\Lambda_i.

    Consequently,

    0Di.0\notin D_i.

    Indeed, if 0Di0\in D_i, then, by the definition of DiD_i,

    uiiΛi,|u_{ii}|\leqslant \Lambda_i,

    which would contradict the hypothesis.

    Thus,

    0i=1nDi.0\notin\bigcup_{i=1}^nD_i.

    Now, by the first question,

    Sp(U)i=1nDi.\operatorname{Sp}(U) \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^nD_i.

    We deduce that

    0Sp(U).0\notin\operatorname{Sp}(U).

    By definition of the spectrum,

    0Sp(U)ker(U)={0}.0\notin\operatorname{Sp}(U) \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \ker(U)=\{0\}.

    The linear map associated with UU is therefore injective. Since it is an endomorphism of the finite-dimensional vector space Cn\mathbb C^n, it is then bijective. Consequently, UU is invertible.

    Thus,

    UGLn(C)  .U\in GL_n(\mathbb C)\; .

Report

For an unclear, ambiguous, or possibly incorrect statement, please use the Discussion tab on the right. Report content that needs moderator intervention, such as dangerous, clearly non-mathematical, or plagiarized content.