Ivan Shishkin, Rye (1878)

Problems/TopologyUnreviewedEdited since review

A reasoning on compactness

by Ancient Tree·
30
Difficulty scaleÉchelle de difficulté

This score reflects both the level of the required concepts and the difficulty of the solution.Ce score tient compte à la fois du niveau des notions nécessaires et de la difficulté de la résolution.

  1. 110First steps / middle schoolPremiers pas / collège
  2. 1125Beginner / high schoolDébutant / lycée
  3. 2650Intermediate / undergraduateIntermédiaire / licence
  4. 5170Advanced / graduateAvancé / master
  5. 7190Expert / specializedExpert / spécialisé
  6. 91100Research levelNiveau recherche
These levels are approximate guides.Ces niveaux sont des repères approximatifs.
·
English
EnglishFrançais
Unreviewed. This problem changed after its last review and should be reviewed again.

Is the following reasoning correct ?

"The set [0,1][0,1] is compact. Indeed, one can write:
[0,1]=[0,23)(12,1][0,1] = \left[0, \tfrac{2}{3}\right) \cup \left(\tfrac{1}{2}, 1\right]and these two intervals, [0,23)\left[0, \tfrac{2}{3}\right) and (12,1]\left(\tfrac{1}{2}, 1\right], are open in [0,1][0,1]. This shows that [0,1][0,1] can be written as a finite union of open subsets."

I solved itMark it doneAdd to my listKeep it in your list

Solutions

1
Reveal solutionsAre you sure? Give it a try first.

Solution by Sequoia

Discussions0 useful votes

It is true that both intervals [0,23)[0,\frac{2}{3}) and (12,1](\frac12,1] are open in [0,1][0,1], however this is not the definition of compactness.

Indeed, one has to consider an arbitrary covering of the desired set, and then deduce that there always exists a finite subcovering of our set. Which is not what we have done here since we already chose a specific covering of our set [0,1][0,1].

Report

For an unclear, ambiguous, or possibly incorrect statement, please use the Discussion tab on the right. Report content that needs moderator intervention, such as dangerous, clearly non-mathematical, or plagiarized content.