Ivan Shishkin, Rye (1878)

Problems/Real analysisReviewed

Limit of a sum of periodic functions

by Ancient Tree·
60
Difficulty scaleÉchelle de difficulté

This score reflects both the level of the required concepts and the difficulty of the solution.Ce score tient compte à la fois du niveau des notions nécessaires et de la difficulté de la résolution.

  1. 110First steps / middle schoolPremiers pas / collège
  2. 1125Beginner / high schoolDébutant / lycée
  3. 2650Intermediate / undergraduateIntermédiaire / licence
  4. 5170Advanced / graduateAvancé / master
  5. 7190Expert / specializedExpert / spécialisé
  6. 91100Research levelNiveau recherche
These levels are approximate guides.Ces niveaux sont des repères approximatifs.
·
English
EnglishFrançais

Let ff and gg be two periodic functions of respective periods T1T_1 and T2T_2. We also assume that f(x)+g(x)f(x)+g(x) admits a limit as xx goes to ++\infty.

Show that f+gf+g is constant.

I solved itMark it doneAdd to my listKeep it in your list

Solutions

2
Reveal solutionsAre you sure? Give it a try first.

Solution by Ancient Tree

Discussions1 useful vote
  1. Let’s start with a simpler case, T1=T2T_1=T_2. Then h=f+gh=f+g is also periodic with period T1T_1. But a periodic function which converges as x+x\rightarrow +\infty is constant, as shown here (link to add, the thing is broken right now). This lemma will prove useful many times.

  2. Now assume that T1T_1 and T2T_2 are distinct. The idea is to check how hh changes when we move according to, say, the period of ff :

h(x+T1)=f(x+T1)+g(x+T1)=f(x)+g(x+T1)h\left(x+T_1\right)=f\left(x+T_1\right)+g\left(x+T_1\right)=f(x)+g\left(x+T_1\right)This is almost h(x)h(x). Let’s make this term appear :

h(x+T1)=f(x)+g(x)g(x)+g(x+T1)=h(x)+g(x+T1)g(x)h\left(x+T_1\right)=f(x)+g(x)-g(x)+g\left(x+T_1\right)=h(x)+g\left(x+T_1\right)-g(x)

We get the following interesting property :

h(x+T1)h(x)=g(x+T1)g(x)h\left(x+T_1\right)-h(x)=g\left(x+T_1\right)-g(x)

which indicates that, when moving according to T1T_1, only the change gg is relevant, and not the change in ff, which makes sense.
By assumption, h(x)h(x) converges to a limit when x+x\rightarrow +\infty, so h(x+T1)h(x+T_1) converges to the same limit ; and so we have that :

g(x+T1)g(x)x+0g\left(x+T_1\right)-g(x) \underset{x \rightarrow+\infty}{\longrightarrow} 0

. But this shows that gg is periodic with period T1T_1, since g(x+T1)g(x)g(x+T_1)-g(x) is itself T2T_2-periodic, so by the same argument as earlier, it has to be 0.

In the end, we get that ff and gg share the same period T1T_1, so f+gf+g too ; by again the same argument, we deduce that f+gf+g is constant.

Solution by La chouette aveugleFR

Discussions1 useful vote

Voici une autre solution. Soit ll la limite quand xx tend vers ++\infty de f(x)+g(x)f(x) + g(x). Quitte à translater la fonction gg par ll sans changer T2T_{2}, on peut supposer que l=0l = 0. Soit xRx \in \mathbb{R}. Comme T1T_{1} et T2T_{2} sont non nulles, on a alors

limnf(x+n(T1+T2))+g(x+n(T1+T2))=0\underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\mathrm{lim}} f(x+n(T_{1}+T_{2}))+g(x+n(T_{1}+T_{2})) = 0.

Or cette limite s’écrit aussi

()limnf(x+nT2)+g(x+nT1)=0(*)\,\,\underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\mathrm{lim}} f(x+nT_{2})+g(x+nT_{1}) = 0.

Comme

limnf(x+nT2)+g(x+nT2)=0\underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\mathrm{lim}}f(x+nT_{2}) + g(x+nT_{2}) = 0,

on déduit que limnf(x+nT2)=g(x)\underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\mathrm{lim}}f(x+nT_{2}) = -g(x). De même, on déduit que limng(x+nT1)=f(x)\underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\mathrm{lim}}g(x+nT_{1}) = -f(x). En injectant ces nouvelles égalités dans ()(*), on trouve que f(x)g(x)=0-f(x)-g(x) = 0, donc que f(x)+g(x)=0f(x)+g(x) = 0, d’où que f+gf+g est constante.

Report

For an unclear, ambiguous, or possibly incorrect statement, please use the Discussion tab on the right. Report content that needs moderator intervention, such as dangerous, clearly non-mathematical, or plagiarized content.